Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Has to be, it would explain my experience.

Ongoing discussion on Quanta article about this paper: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40379175

I have a Galaxy Fold and never heard a peep from those apps after disabling them. Then again I haven't installed the Android 13 update that it keeps begging me to....

I have one too, but find myself favouring the much lighter, cheaper and simpler F-105 anyway.

From the paper [0]:

> We state the following well-known concentration bound, Chernoff bound, for completeness.

Which variant of the Chernoff bound is this? This is almost the (looser variant of the) multiplicative form, but it's not quite right (per the use of 1+delta instead of a single parameter beta). In particular, that bound is only guaranteed to hold for delta >= 0 (not beta = 1 + delta > 0 as asserted in the paper)

[0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10191

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernoff_bound#Multiplicative_...


No, it's not. This immediately caught my eye too. According to google the right number is 7.8 k/s so it was very far off the mark.

So if I'm sick and I have to go to the grocery store i get to spread diseases? Love it

Oh that's cool! Interested to see where your research leads. Could you drop me a link to where the interaction net → cuda compiler resides? I skimmed through the HVM2 repo and just read the .cu runtime file.

This headline does not gain any traction THN?

Multiple people have written multiple compatible alternatives that are lighter weight. Pleroma and its forks (Akkoma looked good last I checked) are popular for single-user servers.

Jaguars and panthers to a lesser extent used to live over the entire globe so really andy habitat where there’s little enough human interaction can support them

> protect against backend capacity issues

That's our primary use case, so I am also curious to hear more.


It is usually the town with the main state university. Sometimes a notable private school instead depending on particulars of the local history.

"Passenger trains weigh nothing."

A bit more than that. And old freight trains are loud, even when empty.

Another example, there is a small local passenger train with a combustion engine. Very loud, whether slow or fast. Unlike the mentioned modern electric one from Alstom, who are so silent, that they are dangerous when they pass by a train station and you are too close to the track. You only notice them moments before they wooosh by.

And if you want more than my anecdota of everyday experience, there are tons of youtube videos of different trains to see that trains can be loud, if that was not a manufacturing concern, or silent. Usually, the older the louder.


Baffling version of history that somehow ignores the constitutional dimension. It's also a back-assward interpretation of how contemporary environmental law came into being. It's like a guy typing with one hand while pointing at the heffalumps for causing the wet streets that made it rain with the other hand.

There is just no real analysis here of law, policy, or society. It's just a pile of uncited errata. I'm somewhat sympathetic to some of his conclusions, but there is no reasoning process here.


While there are definately parallels with bigfoot sightings here, I can personally vouch for how rare cat sightings are.

I have spent a lot of my life in deep wildernes, and the only time I saw a big cat in the wild was when I was a kid (aprox 14yo), up in mid- British Columbia (Canada), literally a hundred miles from any town.

I was alone, waiting at our truck while the family was checking if a side-road was traversable. (My dad was a big wilderness fisher). maybe half a kilometer down the "main" (dirt) road, I saw a huge cat casually walk across the road, into the forest on the other side.

It looked completely black, but likely because the side facing me was in shade. Cougars are the only big cat native to the area.

Of course my dad dismissed my account as daydreaming.

I have seen bear, bobcat, and even Coyotee in the wild. Not wolf though.


Like all natural implants, the implants cause scar tissue over time destroying neural tissue, reducing connection and detection effectiveness. This goes for all implants atm, they all cease to function after 6 months.

Tim Cook in response to a shareholder proposing scrapping accessibility to improve ROI:

“When we work on making our devices accessible by the blind, I don’t consider the bloody ROI”.


The Mitsubishi Outlander is not exactly a truck but it's close.

120 VAC:

https://youtu.be/dIZsACfqB-E?t=46

and it has 20kWh battery:

https://carbuzz.com/news/2023-mitsubishi-outlander-phev-has-...

I feel cars have been stuck in boring mode for 2 decades, but now with zany stuff like power outlets and such, they are getting more interesting.


It just looks busier without any benefit to me.

Having the colon touching the type definition always made more sense to me

So instead of this:

  func foo(x: int, y: int): int   {
      var sum: int = x + y
      return sum
  }
You’d have this instead:

  func foo(x :int, y :int) :int   {
      var sum :int = x + y
      return sum
  }

100 Mbps Ethernet over barbed wire was demonstrated back in 1995. [0]

"Only four properties really affect the performance of most digital transmission structures. The "big four" transmission-line properties are impedance, delay, high-frequency loss, and crosstalk." Dr Johnson then goes to describe these properties in barbed wire.

0: https://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/edn/SoGoodBarbedWire.htm

P.S. Yes, this is the Dr. Howard Johnson of the famed "High-Speed Digital Design" book.


A lot of this ham-fisted approach to shoving AI into everything reminds me of other trends that corps were desperately pushing 5 years ago: "voice is the new UI" from Amazon and Google, and "pivot to video" from Facebook.

It wasn't for the benefit of consumers, it was to create a segment they felt they could dominate.


One 'silly' question from this novice linux kernel driver developer: if the ->read() and ->write() operations in the Linux kernel file operations structure go away, then what happens to read() and write() from user space? Which file operations do those call trigger in the kernel driver?

That's a lovely addition, thanks! I'll have to try it out as well at some point.

FWIW where I live in Sweden the delivery is charged based on peak usage also for residential customers. Based on average of top three peak kWh/h in a month.

A 6TB M2 SSD upgrade on a laptop is anything BUT cheap. That's why these HDDs exist. For the data hoarders on a budget who also need some portability instead of leaving everything at home on a NAS. You keep your existing 512/1024 SSD in your laptop for the OS/apps, and get a 2.5 HDD for all the large cold storage data: steam library, nextcloud, backups, movies, etc.

Yeah, saw that note earlier in the week. I have it set to read-only through docker for now, but I like the idea of being able to edit metadata. We'll see.

This eliminates the benefits of multitenancy since you don't get to downsize the server - you still provisioning for maximum rates on all clients simultaneously

Is this suspicious or just weird? You don't think it happened?

edit: especially that OP indeed posts an old submission every hour.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: